New DFG-supported project at ACoM
The proposal "Simulation of Rare and Transient Events in Rarefied Gas Dynamics" (PIs: Dr. Georgii Oblapenko and Prof. Manuel Torrilhon) has been successfully funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the associated project will run over the next 3 years.
The goal of the project is develop new capabilities for stochastic particle-based simulations of unsteady rarefied gas flows, with a more specific goal of being able to better model low-probability processes that despite their low incidence of occurence may be significant contributors to crucial physical effects. An example is the backscattering process in space propulsion, where even despite a low probability of particles ejected from the thruster flying in the direction of the satellite, the flux accumulates over the mission lifetime, leading to surface contamination and degradation. Modelling such low-probability phenomena is challenging, especially when 1) stochastic methods are used 2) the flow is unsteady.
Therefore, new mathematical models are needed to resolve these issues, and will be developed within the framework of the new project.

This image shows the distribution of points in the unit square. Pseudo-random numbers are scattered irregularly, while quasi-random numbers cover the space more evenly.
This image shows the error for different moments of the distribution function (energy and stress) during relaxation from a non-equilibrium state to equilibrium. The results demonstrate that quasi-random numbers achieve faster convergence and thus require fewer particles for the same accuracy.






The figure shows relative error of the next higher moment for a range velocity shifts in the bimodal test case. The left part of the figure shows the relative error for even number of moments while the right one shows odd cases. Different plot markers with colors represent the closure. Note, that the Gramian and extended Gramian closure are defined in the even and odd case differently.
This figure presents the proposed WB method (top row) against the non-well-balanced (NWB) variation (bottom row) and their abilities (or lack thereof) to capture a small perturbation of a steady-state. It is clear that the WB method captures the proper structure of the solution even on a coarse mesh, while the NWB method has smearing of the solution due to numerical error -- even on a refined mesh.







